I recall someone (a former cast member) saying that SNL always went from super to mediocre casts consistently, almost every complete cast change cycle. One good-one bad and so on. Possible explanation was that viewers like some casts so much that the next one inevitably becomes a disappointment regardless of its own merits. I give this theory some credibility. Julia Lois-Dreyfuss (who I believe said that) admittedly was in the "bad"-cycle cast and is not remembered for her SNL performances much. Same with a few other successful comedians like Chris Rock.
Regarding the current state of SNL, I disagree with troutman's viewpoint on it being the same hit'n'miss as always. I think it is suffering from over-politicization of its material and from becoming way too partisan. SNL used to be relatively apolitical and focusing mainly on being funny with various degrees of success. Since Trump, SNL's material has been decidedly left-leaning and very political, which makes it a lot less funny even when skits are good and hitting their intended marks.
Host selection has become puzzling. Mulaney hoisting for the 5th time in 2 years is plain ridiculous. Even Wiig: other than "Bridesmaids", what has she done post-SNL to deserve 4 host appearances?
Also, musical guests are now a lot less deserving of an SNL stage than they used to be (unless you really like rap music and teen-pop).
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
|