It looks to me rather like iggy_oi has got the conclusion he wants and constructed his arguments backwards from there, and is annoyed that anyone should point out that the arguments don't work.
It is almost never helpful to argue with people who do that, because they are not seeking truth but personal validation, and if they don't get what they are after, they take it personally. It's like trying to play pool with someone who only wants to use the cue as a backscratcher.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|