Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
I guess you and Bingo have never read the CBA because it is net of direct costs. That means that you can deduct the direct costs related to creating the revenue (like deductions on your taxes).
|
First off just don't get why the need to be pissy, I'm just trying to dig into numbers.
And I can barely read legal documents that pertain to me directly, I have the attention span of a gnat.
Happy to incorporate if we can figure it out.
But the $1.7M and $1.8M estimates were explaining hockey related revenue so they were likely net and takes back to that 50% mark again in my mind.
But clearly this is pretty convoluted. The funny thing is the intent ... was just pointing out that starting the league at 72% of league's salaries and potentially nothing from a huge chunk of the league's revenue (36% or 50%) is pretty rough.
Just seems like detail chasing as a way to move the goal posts around for some in this discussion.