12-11-2020, 10:32 AM
|
#7392
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=51925156452c
Quote:
SURPRISING FACT
The states’ amicus brief largely takes aim at the four targeted states’ expanded voting rules—but their arguments are often contradictory, such as opposing states extending their deadlines by which mail-in ballots must be received. The brief alleges that extended deadlines provide “a post-election window of time during which nefarious actors could wait and see whether the Presidential election would be close, and whether perpetrating fraud...would be worthwhile,” despite the fact that several states that signed on to the brief—Kansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, Utah and West Virginia—accept mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day themselves. Texas also allows mail-in ballots that arrive up to one day after the election, and despite chastising the battleground states for expanding their voting rules, Texas also changed some of its voting rules to accommodate voters during the Covid-19 pandemic.
|
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|