Quote:
Originally Posted by sec304
Is there a good article out there that explains what the players and owners are arguing about? I haven't paid too much attention in the last month or so. I just figured if the revenue was split 50/50 and they played the season, the players would understand the paycut would be huge if revenue dipped without fans.
Are they just arguing about what their salaries would be if they play a shortened season?
|
My guess is if the season is played and its an even 50/50 split, the owners 50% wont even be close to covering operating costs.
The 50/50 must be before operating costs correct or else the league would have Hollywood accountants and never make a "profit".