Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Nope, the bolded are wrong. In the before times, owners paid into escrow the same as players, and players would get back more than their full share of escrow in the event of higher than projected HRR.
One of the biggest problems has always been the design of the salary cap and that more teams spend more above the mid point than below. And it's a positive feedback loop, as once that is the case every 'cap dollar' only cost like $0.95 in real money.
|
Yeah thanks. I found an article that discusses this a little too.
https://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/a...-that-all-mean
They negotiated a 50/50 split of revenue and included so many complicating factors like escalators etc. that the agreement is straying from a pure sharing of revenues.