Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos+Dec 9 2004, 09:30 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RougeUnderoos @ Dec 9 2004, 09:30 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Bleeding Red@Dec 9 2004, 01:53 PM
I'm just saying that the argument is possible. If the activist gay couple could prove that the clergyperson has been flexible in his beliefs and practices in the past, then the court may say that he/she must be flexible now
|
Anything is possible. Who is to say a straight couple won't try to "make a point" and start a big beef because they can't get married in a Catholic church? I doubt there is any representative of any religion that would preside over a wedding ceremony involving me without having me jump through some Holy Hoops that I don't believe in.
Maybe I'll challenge them all to make a point about religious discrimination.
How far do you think I'll get? [/b][/quote]
With the right amount of money and a good lawyer or two - all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Anything is possible which brings up the odd questions and scenarios and leads to the debate, and the debate has been fun. thanks. Elvis is leaving the building.