Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
There’s bigger implications for the players long term than just losing more of their already reduced salary.
From a labour relations perspective the players agreeing to this amendment in the manner it’s been presented would have a similar effect to their bargaining relationship with the league as if the players went on a wild cat strike demanding a share of the Seattle franchise fee when it was announced and the owners gave in.
|
Is the league asking for much more than proration relative to season length? Because there is a very strong argument that is where the signed agreement already stands...
Without knowing the owners specific demands it’s hard to say, but it’s possible the players are the ones backing out of the deal as signed
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk