Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
Yes and I can’t be bothered to continue explaining to you how it does not guarantee a 50/50 revenue split when it’s quite clear that is the case and you refuse to acknowledge it.
Are you under the impression that the clause regarding an extra year being added on if player salaries are not within $125M-$250M of a 50/50 split does not exist?
How does the league make up for a shortfall in revenues in the last season of this deal if escrow is capped and can’t be increased for that season?
|
Are you trying to use some form of thin logic to say that if the escrow balance before the 23/24 is less than $125M, that the parties don't actually get back to EXACTLY 50/50?
Is that your argument?
If yes, I'll bet you are a hit at parties.