Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
lol
They signed a CBA agreeing to exactly that. Those are the facts.
|
Yes and that’s a very different statement than suggesting it’s what they wanted, which you and Locke have been doing.
The fact is this current CBA actually delinks revenues and salaries. You’re aware of that right? Well actually you’re probably not since you think the 50/50 revenue splitting factors into this discussion at all.
If you’re going to criticize my position that you’re both out to lunch in your assessment that the players were the ones who wanted a 50/50 partnership and split of revenues, please explain how they ended up with 57% share of revenues in the CBA after the first lockout.
And as powderjunkie pointed out, there’s a big difference between agreeing to something to get a deal done and having wanted that outcome.