Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I dont see the problem here. The players wanted to be partners. 50/50.
If the revenue isnt there, they have to shoulder their share. Regardless of the previous agreement.
Things changed.
Its annoying that people want to be in for the good times, but sheltered from the pot-holes.
They see the owners making a lot of money and they want their share, but when things go bad they want no part of it.
Yeah, the owners make a lot of money, but they also take a lot of risk. You wanted in and now you're looking at the downside? Who are these clowns?
|
Was this current agreement not what the league wanted when it was signed?