Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
I haven't ready of of the articles, but is this true? I would have guessed that they got more data back, and it just moved the percentage, since the original number was based on a fairly limited number of results. I'd suspect it would be pretty dumb to falsify your data in this highly scrutinized trial. So is this just conjecture on your part?
|
Yes, conjecture on my part, but why else come out with one percentage number and then revise it to the same percentage another company is claiming?