Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHot25
I think you are taking this a bit far.
A) this is Fox news. The fact that they even cut them off is big news. Big.
B) They are relatively new to dooing this, so adding in a "of course if he brings real and actual proof we will revisit" seems reasonable to me.
I saw it with almost all media on twitter during their horrid landscaping press conference. People showed up, they started saying junk, the media said "woah, this is junk...we are leaving...if they say anything with actual evidence...".
|
Am I? Or are you just not being as critical as you should because it was Fox? What was missing from that supposed rebuke? The rebuke? But was certainly said was "rigging, cheating, fraud and illegal voting." Again, this is a soft propaganda technique used to frame and issue and prime a listening audience. You interpret it one way, because that is your frame. The Fox audience is going to pick up on the terms they have been conditioned to hear. Again, what as missing from that? The language that clearly stated that "rigging, cheating, fraud and illegal voting" was NOT happening, but clearly language that suggests it could be. More after this.