Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
And what was my point? There were inconsistencies in the data that were alarming and we should be watching this closely. It gave the appearance of the books being cooked and interference. Questions needed to be asked. I was not the only one who saw it and believed it needed to be addressed. The AZ SoS did the right thing and explained the process the state is following, which is exactly what I and others were looking for. You have to admit that it looks pretty bad when candidate X needs to achieve a ballot grab of Y percent, and each time they dip below that trend a new number of ballots is put into the count? That was a very bad pattern that raised some eyebrows.
|
Every step of the process is being observed by democrats and republicans. So if no poll watchers has reported any irregularities then the default assumption should be the system is working.
I agree the SOS did the correct thing by addressing people’s false assumptions with limited information to try to improve trust in the elections
I think speculation of fraud using data that is incomplete is dangerous and lowers people’s trust in the system.