Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
People called you ignorant and questioned your critical thinking because nobody would come to the conclusion you came to, or consider their premise worth discussing, if they had watched the video with critical thinking.
It's a video of camera equipment being dropped off and a bunch of people carrying their own personal bags in. That's it. There's zero evidence that they contain ballots, there's zero evidence that there's a security issue, there's zero evidence of anything that anyone with basic critical thinking skills would take issue with.
Nobody addressed your concern because it wasn't valid, it was entirely based on Crowder and some lady telling you what to believe about what you watched. You didn't think for yourself, you let two talking heads think for you, and now you're upset because nobody else did the same.
You don't want to be accused of being a conspiracy theorist? Then use some critical thinking when you're watching a video, and stop believing everything you watch and read when your own eyes should tell you different.
|
You are something else man.
Actually, this needs to be said.
You consistently debase someone else’s position to make it easier for you to denigrate the person. It’s amazing you can write multiple paragraphs based on insults, assumptions and false claims, when you could have otherwise ignored, or used the one sentence of actual substance in your post if you felt the need to reply.
Instead, you tired to make me look stupid for having the audacity to question something, and when I called out you not addressing the issue, you stoop to entirely baseless personal attack.
It’s interesting how you couldn’t be bothered to answer the original question because it wasn’t valid, yet you were sure quick to respond to the imaginary, non-existing one.
I did not claim they were bags full of ballots. I claimed I don’t agree that personal belongings should enter a secured area unchecked. That’s not a position I had to learn from a YouTube video, by the way; it’s pretty standard practise for secured entry points.
Keep it up. You do a wonderful job at being terrible at arguing effectively. It would be nice to have the level of self assured audacity that you seem to possess. Where any argument you don’t immediately side with is the result of someone else’s stupidity. Must be pure bliss to go through life as not just an ass, but a damn fine arrogant one at that.