Quote:
Originally Posted by 81MC
Council agreed to remove minimum parking requirements for non-residential use.
So, where permit parking is needed, residents should pay, and you need to have onsite parking for a secondary suite.
But developers can offload the cost and burden of parking space entirely to the general public? I’m not sure I understand.
|
EDIT: Looks like I was mistaken about the whole thing.
Thought we were talking about street parking permits that is being explored. Not parking spot minimums. Yeah, not sure I agree with the decision. Some of the bigger developments on 16th ave have had the concern expressed that parking will be an issue and the developers and the city have said "there is parking spot minimums so don't worry about it" but wonder if that will still be true now.