I do find it interesting how this though process works:
1) We all agree that computers are vastly better than humans at taking in a ton of inputs, computing them, and spitting out appropriate outputs
2) We also all agree that winter driving requires a driver to consider far more inputs than normal driving (how slippery is the road, will I start to skid if I hit the brakes, etc.)
But after putting these two together, the conclusion is that human drivers are better than computers at winter driving. I don't get it.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
|