Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Bill Miller (no relation), a UND alumn, went on his show and called for Mitchell Miller to have his scholarship revoked. And his arguments is the same nonsensical claim that all 14 year olds know right from wrong. That claim doesn't even hold true for adults, let alone children.
You're objecting to the word "alumni"? Okay then.
|
He did not call for Mitchell Miller to have his scholarship revoked. Calling for something means to publicly declare it must happen. He simply believes Miller forfeited his right to a scholarship, in his opinion, and an NHL career, in his opinion. He did not instruct UND or the NHL to do either of those things, what right would he have to do so?
And nonsensical claim? You mean science? At the age of two children understand right and wrong. By the age of ten, most children have developed an clear understanding of right and wrong, the general implications of both, and that doing wrong causes disruption and chaos. And it’s not just an understanding, the body produces a chemical reaction when they are doing something wrong. That’s science.
What you’ve described, as in a 14 year old (and especially an adult) who doesn’t know right from wrong, is someone with antisocial personality disorder. After rejecting the term “psychopath,” you’re describing Miller as one. I certainly don’t think he is, but you believe he is?