Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
So nothing proven or tangible to support this claim, only an article from an industry source of propaganda suggesting the advantage from plants not yet online? Nothing scientific that can actually look at the difference? So this is a black box where they are making claims of an advantage but no real data to support such a claim, and then no comparison between the local market products and then what the cost of condensation and transport of the product?
|
You can look up the CO2 composition of various natural gas reservoirs around the world if you would like to contest that particular assertion
You can also look at the power sources that run the plant and evaluate if the energy used to compress the gas runs greener. These are easily disprovable if you doubt the information Azure provided. It is certainly reasonable at face value.
You are correct the the main LNG process for essentially every plant in the world is engineered by either Choyota or JGC or in some cases like LNG Canada, Both. So the tech used within is relatively similar.
Pembina Institute has an excellent report on the opportunities For reduction of GHGs from an LNG. You can go through these and evaluate if you believe that Canada does a better job of managing these sources as other jurisdictions.
https://www.pembina.org/reports/pi-w...rne-022014.pdf