Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
@Nyah: Dammit, I was hoping something that hilarious was actually in there.
That would be fine if the presumption of innocence was a thing in the court of public opinion. Simply being named in something like this is itself damaging, whether or not you are actually implicated. It's an awkward balancing act of getting justice for victims while protecting the rights of the accused.
Once they're found guilty, whole different story.
|
Look....normally I would agree with you.
However in this instance...I dont know what to think. Were there other Leisure activities offered on Jeffrey Epstein's clandestine sex-island?
Water-skiing? Kite Surfing? Upright Paddle Boarding? Kayaking?
I dont know. But I'd wager that one went to Jeffery Epstein's Clandestine Sex-Island with a purpose in mind. And it probably wasnt snorkelling.
I didnt mean to imply a sexual euphemism to snorkelling, but its there now and do with it what you will.
If this is just 'Guilt by Association' I think they kind of have to take it. I'm sorry, I know thats not how our legal system works which is probably why this all took place on an island in the Bahamas. Different laws. But somehow I think the excuse of:
"I went to Jeff's Illegal non-extraditional Sex Island because they have the best Mai-Tais on the planet!!"
Probably isnt going to hold much water.