Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Greenwald is looking at this issue the same way he looked at the Pentagon Papers, WikiLeaks, etc.
|
The way he looked at the Pentagon Papers? Glenn Grennwald was four years old when the Pentagon Papers were spilled by Daniel Ellsberg. WTF are you talking about?
And then the great job that Greenwald did on Wikileaks? You mean not recognizing that that Wikileaks was a front for a Russian intelligence operation? Yeah, Greenwald was right on top of that one!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
lol, this is such a load of crap it is actually hilarious.
"I warned you guys about that guy!!"
Unreal.
And for the record, Greenwald isn't the only 'journalist' with an issue here. If you wouldn't be such a partisan hack you'd see that.  |
Please point out where I am wrong. Greenwald got sucked into helping a Russian asset get American intelligence information out in the open. He then got sucked into defending a Russian intelligence front operation. So where is the error smart guy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
There is no evidence that the emails are fake.
|
Huh.... ??? There is a ton of evidence the emails are fake. Not being able to produce message headers is a pretty big red flag. Them not existing anywhere but on the laptop is a pretty good indication of them being bull####. This wouldn't pass an intro class intro forensic investigation class let alone FBI examination.