View Single Post
Old 10-14-2020, 04:48 PM   #6374
HockeyIlliterate
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
And those are the correct answers to those questions

In all previous Supreme Court hearings they are not allowed to comment on how cases that are likely required to be ruled on. This has always been the case.
Yes, but....

There are a few really obvious and “there is only one possible answer” to some of these types of questions.

Like can the President unilaterally delay an election? The answer is a clear “no,” and I would expect an alleged constitutional originalist to know that.

So either she doesn’t know the Constitution (doubtful), she’s not really an originalist (more likely, as these kind of people just make up stuff and use “originalism” as an excuse), or she’s incapable of taking a position when it matters—-which I’m sure everyone would agree is a great trait to have in a Supreme Court justice.
HockeyIlliterate is offline