Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Respectfully disagree.
When it comes to the bottom six, I would rather have Lucic than Johnson.
I just think it's better to have the size and hitting of Lucic, even if he costs the salary cap $750k more per season. Johnson has no value as a bottom 6 IMO, while Lucic does. At this point, I don't think Johnson brings anything more than we already have to the top 6 either.
Plus, Lucic was great in the playoffs.
|
Who was talking about the bottom 6?
Anyone that was going to claim Johnson would play him in the tip 6.
In ant event, Lucic has one of the more immovable contracts in the league.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk