View Single Post
Old 10-09-2020, 01:04 PM   #477
mrkajz44
First Line Centre
 
mrkajz44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
I disagree.

The problem with support programs with defined criteria, is at some point, someone hits a threshold that takes said support away. By making it a constant, there is no disincentive to improving yourself. Taxation should be used to make it a gradient of benefit, where high income earners who are nowhere near making decisions based on UBI have it clawed back via taxation.
I think we are actually saying the same thing for the most part. Maybe I'm just getting hung up on wording, but UBI is universal - everyone gets it. My point is there should be a means test for those that actually need UBI-like support and it gets clawed back as they start to meet their own needs. Your suggestion of having it clawed by via taxation is the same concept, but just with a different mechanism.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mrkajz44 For This Useful Post: