Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
Everyone is crazy and Markstrom would be a terrible signing.
I'm not even trying to sugarcoat it anymore.
He would be decent for 2 years, and then cripple the franchise with another Neal contract.
|
Markstrom was a late bloomer with very few miles on him. At 4 years it would be a good signing. Almost every FA goalie contract comes with at least a year of bad contract. That's just the way it is.
This team just needs some kind of stability. Average goaltending from a guy who can play a starter's game load. Rittich and Talbot were only good for stretches.