View Single Post
Old 02-13-2007, 12:28 PM   #29
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
The US may be overstretched to the degree that it cannot engage in a comprehensive land campaign of Iran, but it certainly has the capability to make things tough for Iran.

Carrier groups have planes and planes have bombs.
True enough. But "make things tough" is a different proposition than invading and establishing command and control--which is probably what it would take to get Iran to abandon their nuclear ambitions. Let's not forget that Ahmadinejad (sp?!) is probably crazy--and not that well liked in Iran anyway. A war with the U.S., especially a relatively powerless U.S., might be just the tonic he needs to rally the people behind him.

Also, it's a mountainous region, far larger than Iraq, and far more militarily powerful, with more money, more stability as a regime, etc. etc. There's a reason they're rattling their sabres right now. I don't think Iran is very afraid of the U.S. at the moment--which may be the gravest miscalculation Bush has made--overestimating the ability of the U.S. to use their military might to influence the actions of others.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote