Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
The good thing for Kamala is that Trump gave her a lot to work with.
She can basically use it to reinforce what a terrible person Trump is
|
At some point, people are going to figure out that this is a pointless exercise, right?
I mean, for ####'s sake, if you weren't convinced about who Trump was as a human being by this point in the 2016 cycle you weren't paying attention. You've had four years of Trump being Trump. Everyone who it's possible to convince that he's a bad person is convinced. This accomplishes nothing. The only thing Kamala and Joe can do that will make a difference is to actually point out, hey, we actually understand the problems facing this country and making your life difficult right now, and we have the following solutions. If Trump is going to continue being a man-baby, that's out of your hands.
Of course if he keeps shouting overtop of you you're going to have a hard time communicating anything but Joe's best moments - from the few bits I was able to sit through - seem to have been when he managed to thread that needle. Kamala needs to do likewise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
I've said this repeatedly, but how the rest of you aren't bored a #### right now is beyond me. We've been playing out the string for months now, Trump is quite clearly going to lose the election, and we're just waiting to see how he plans on staying in power in the aftermath. There are no undecides to convince, and virtually nothing can be done by either candidate that will cost them support.
|
Eh, this view assumes that turnout is also fixed, which isn't the case I don't think.