Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton
If you disagree with Crown Royal he calls you racist, if you present facts to Crown Royal he calls you racist, if you defend police, Crown Royal calls you racist. If you don’t believe Crown Royals sob story about the time he got pulled over he calls you a racist, if you explain how a judge or jury could potentially find police officer not guilty of a murder charge, Crown Royal calls you racist.
Crown Royal likes to have race discussions provided the discussion is him calling anybody who disagrees with him racist.
|
And yet, many people have done all of the above (except refusing to believe his story, I'm not sure you'll get much sympathy for getting a negative reaction when you call someone a liar) and not been called racist.
So, is it a reflection of Crown Royal that you mistakenly believe all of these things result in being accused of racism, or is it worth reflecting on why these things result in being accused of racism for certain people?
I mean if your theory was true, indes, Cecil, Corsi, and myself all would have been called outright racist for disagreeing with Crown's approach or calling it undeserved, no? Is that what happened? Were we all called racists? I guess I'll have to check my notes.
Honest question, no leading, no bull####. Have any of the few people here that have been called "racist" questioned whether or not their views might be racist? Or has that part of the equation been missed? I get that the accusation is not nice, but really, have you ever questioned your own beliefs to see if racism has had an effect on the way you think?