Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Joey Ingram did a deep, deep dive into the Postle thing. Just look it up on YouTube. Also, the thread in 2+2 was quite epic. He was clearly cheating, and the evidence is beyond a reasonable doubt if you understand poker, but not sufficient to convict him. The civil suit against the casino was dismissed.
|
I’ll have to watch the video but can you please clarify the bolded? It seems contradictory as if the evidence is beyond a reasonable doubt that should be enough to convict. Or are you saying he should have been convicted but the judge/jury didn’t have enough understanding of poker to remove this doubt?