Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
The essential problem with BoLevi's position is that he's assuming that the Democrats would be doing the inverse of what the Republicans are doing if they had the ability - i.e., that if they had been able to confirm Garland in 2016, and RBG had still died when she did, the Democrats would be making the argument that no replacement should be nominated and that the next guy should do that. And hey, maybe he's right. We'll never know.
|
I'm not assuming anything. I'm identifying a fact: the Democrats fought against a concept in 2016, and now are fighting the reverse in 2020. That's all I'm claiming.
I do not think it is a coincidence that in both cases they were arguing in their own interest. Perhaps you do.