09-21-2020, 11:59 AM
|
#2248
|
Truculent!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
TENET Spoilers:
Spoiler!
Yeah, the sound was ridiculous for sure.
Here's a good timeline:
https://i.redd.it/5uegt6o7alj51.jpg
The ending explained that Denzel's kid started it, and he will use it to go further back to meet up with the younger Robert Pattinson.
And just to be clear, it's not Back to the Future time travel. If we say Day 1 was today, and we spent a week in normal time to Day 7. On Day 7 if we got inverted, we would need to spend a week inverted (how we would perceive it), and we would end up back on Day 1. During that Day 1 through Day 7 there are two of us, one travelling normally and one travelling backwards inverted.
If we were to instead started on Day 1, went to Day 7, got inverted, and spent 3 days inverted, on Days 4 through 7, there would be three of us. Our youngest self going through time normally, an inverted one going through backwards, and our oldest self going through time normally. That's how they got John Washington fighting himself and Pattinson at the same time.
|
It now is starting to make sense to me.
I hate the movie less now. I might even like it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
|
|
|
|