Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
circumstantial ecidence? shadow of a doubt? this is science, not my cousin vinnie
|
Well the evidence is based or circumstance. We don't know what would or could happen if humans weren't here or didn't take this current path. We can surmise and make intelligent guesses, but we can't know for sure. It's possible the earth could be heating up or changing onit's own. It's also possible we're saving ourselves from a long overdue ice age.
I tend to agree with current global warming evidence, but obviously many do not. I was trying to say that even if the science or theories can't be proven 100% like other theories or scientific rules and laws, the case for man-made global warming is strong, and there's really no danger in trying to fix it even if for some reason the conclusion is incorrect.
Aside from picking on my vernacular, did you enjoy the post?
