Irrelevant?
My assertion was questioned, I provided examples, and it was questioned again. So there’s the actual numbers, the math is literally right there.
Particularly since you brought up the particulates, which is exactly whats measured regarding wood burning.
If you’ve sat around a fire for 9 hours, you’ve witnessed particulate pollution roughly equivalent to an average car for an entire year.
I’ve provided data which supports my position. If you wish to believe that emissions testing would meaningfully reduce air pollution, feel free to provide some sort of evidence to support it.
But given that the most environmentally restrictive part of the country has decided it not meaningful enough, Good luck.
__________________
No, no…I’m not sloppy, or lazy. This is a sign of the boredom.
|