View Single Post
Old 09-16-2020, 02:35 PM   #340
Leondros
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
Leondros, did you not post yourself the chart showing that the negative taxation effects those making above 200K/year? That is not the uber-rich, but certainly not the middle class as blankall suggests.

At a certain point the scale of money that we are talking about in terms of personal income becomes a number that is not being returned to the local economy by the people that are earning it.

Also, I would venture that if people making over 200K/year are working 75 hours per week, then they need to restructure their own life/work ratio to enjoy their own pre-retirement years. If there is a lack of incentive for people to work excessively, that is probably a good thing for the people themselves.

Also, I'd like to apologize to blankall, I did not mean you personally were saying that poor people were lazy, but rather generally that many times in this thread it was insinuated that 20K/year would cause a general malaise, which is a statement with no basis in reality. I can't imagine someone refusing to work because they can afford Netflix for free.
I was simply trying to provide some visual examples for people who were having trouble seeing how UBI would impact taxable income and how that would flow out.

A lot of assumptions were made that I don't necessarily believe in including that a 15% flat taxation rate gets us even close to be able to fulfill the UBI dream. I believe a GST tax, massive cuts, and shifts to social programs would all be needed and then some. Not to mention the taxes at a corporate level that will make business in Canada very unattractive leading to lower GDP and even less of a tax base.

While I believe UBI to be a nice idea, I put it up there with ideas like immortality and AI taking over the world - possible, but probably not in my life time. Blankall put it correctly, what we need is some semblance of wealth distribution while at the same time correcting a lot of social issues that are all interconnected. For this to be as successful as some have be postulating, a lot of prerequisites need to happen first while at the same time the implementation can't be "make the rich pay for it". History has proven that doesn't exactly work.
Leondros is offline   Reply With Quote