View Single Post
Old 09-15-2020, 12:11 PM   #238
81MC
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
I disagree. Living in a non-shared accommodation is no less a need than living in a house with three other people. The base need is shelter, everything above that is essentially a "want" if that's how you choose to look at it, which includes basically anything above a drop-in shelter.

You also need to clarify what you think the government should base the funding level on. Two people? Three? Four? Five? It's nice in theory to allow the government dictate how many people you need to live with to survive, but that's not how it should be calculated.
Generally, private sleeping quarters for different sexed children and non-spousal partners is a pretty reasonable take. I believe that’s also how most agencies also provide housing assistance?

I don’t think anyone is suggesting it’s appropriate for a 20 YO female to have no option but to share a bedroom. But renting a bedroom in a facility with shared washrooms/kitchens, like was and is pretty normal in a lot of the world is absolutely a reasonable standard.
__________________
No, no…I’m not sloppy, or lazy. This is a sign of the boredom.
81MC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 81MC For This Useful Post: