Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
So you're saying the core was worth building around 3 years ago by moving picks, but the core proved to be bad so now the course of action is to change out a component of that core and not build around them anymore and instead just run with your new core without any support.
Sounds like a very exciting recipe for a 9th place team.
|
You should really invest in some dimmer switches in your house ... seems like you're stuck in a binary thought process.
If you think you have the horses you add to it and open up a window.
If the horses don't turn out to be as quick as you thought they were you have an option to rebuild completely or tinker with the core in a chemistry standpoint and see if you can find a mix going forward that makes the team better on the ice in an overall sense, but specifically in a chips are down sense.
Not sure why you want to paint hockey executives into a corner where they can't change an opinion, or rethink their building plan based on new information.
Certainly not the way I manage things in my world.