Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer
That's fine, but yes you did and yes you are. Another example is the fact I never said it's "not that bad", as you directly imply with your quotations. Those are literal words literally being put in my mouth. I said that I have seen worse offenses in other media, which does nothing to make any of it OK. You went on to imply that I was of the mind to tell people to accept pedophiles based on sexual preference inclusiveness. That's offensive to me since I've given no indication that would lead you to that ridiculous conclusion.
I don't expect an apology, but again I would appreciate you not attributing words and ideas to me which I have not expressed.
|
I apologize to you, not trying to attribute to you what is not. I will explain my "being a pedo is a sexual preference" comment. The same crowd (for lack of a better word) that defends these types of movies, have said that about pedophiles.
Maybe I'm over reacting, have not seen the movie but the snippets I saw are vile and should not exist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
I’ll admit, it’s a fine line when making a film about disturbing content without glorifying it. This filmmaker failed miserably and to make it worse, Netflix doubled down by marketing the movie on its sexualization! It’s impossible to pretend they didn’t see it, they based the advertising on it.
|
It's worse, Netflix claimed the promotional imagery was an unfair characterization of the film. That's what the problem was, the posters and such not the movie itself, that is perfectly fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Honestly its not art, its not edgy, Netflix should rip it down, burn the films or hardrives and the people that made this should probably not work again.
Just watching that clip was gross and it felt like pedo marketing.
|
This is the problem, the people running Netflix don't think there is anything wrong they greenlit they thing after all. And are promoting it.