Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
Well as my original post indicated, Scorp made a very good argument as to why Edmundson is somebody you shouldn't be spending draft capital on and I agreed with it.
I saw that a poster claimed he was a top 4 dman on a cup winning team, but that was later proved to be false.
My point is that there has been evidence presented as to why this isn't a great move and none presented as to why it is. Do you have something? I'm game for any and all view points.
|
Well no, nothing was proven. Some stats were presented as an argument against him being a top 4. But any conclusions from those stats are highly debatable and far from definitive.
Personally, I don't have any strong opinions or viewpoints on Edmundson, which is why I haven't presented any. But I have strong views on peoples' overuse of hockey stats, which is why I presented them.