View Single Post
Old 09-11-2020, 09:51 AM   #66
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
The most common reaction to this is more aggressive progressive taxation. But that aggressive taxation only addresses the uber-wealthy and misses (or treats as an afterthought) how that capital gets to the masses of under and unemployed (in this scenario).
The other issue is that if you're uber wealthy, you may not be earning a whole lot of regular income (it's not like you're getting a paycheck), and to the extent you are, you're funneling it through tax havens. So the traditional income tax model isn't a great way to deal with the 21st century drivers of income inequality.

Wealth taxes and capital taxes were one attempted solution, but they simply don't work in practice, which is why they've been repealed in most places they've been tried.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote