[White Out 403]

Originally Posted by PepsiFree

I'm satirizing the focus on the typical narratives (criminal history, the over-dependence on police statements which are often proven wrong, and the slippery slope argument) which stop people from critically analyzing each situation by the situation itself, by applying that to a 13-year-old boy with autism, which should be patently ridiculous and obvious satire.

Of course the situations are wildly different and no well-adjusted human being would seriously apply this ridiculousness to this situation, but the typical narrative is an equally silly distraction that is applied without thought again and again. People have a difficult time seeing how criminal history has no bearing in many (not all) of these shootings, but it has become a joke for how widely and casually it's depended on, given how irrelevant of a subject it usually is.

Perfect time for satire. Well thought out.