Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHot25
I guess I'm just confused Weitz. You: - You don't know how much it should cost, despite first saying it was too much.
- Imply that the "wrong auditors" were chosen (overkill).
- Given the point above, imply that the investigation is overkill.
- Also you note "...for what they are trying to investigate here", which implies you think it may not be as serious as pretty much everyone else seems to think it is (it was referred to the RCMP)
But "you're not sure" and get defensive when people challenge your thoughts (e.g. "no one said that").
It just comes across...not in the way I think you think it does. I didn't mean any offense to you, but that was my partisan comment - it seems like a lot of protesting about this issue, just....because? |
A $64,000 investigation that turns up $5400 in wrongful charges is a poor use of public funds. If anything it should convince the city to have a system in place that can check this stuff out for cheaper. Maybe an independent person who can approve all expenses? I don’t know. Even nenshi says checking previous years would be too expensive.
Is there even partisanship in city politics? I don’t even know who my councillor is haha. Moved since the last election.