Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
I'm not sure, but I am familiar with the group from PWC they used, and I think that is overkill for what they are trying to investigate here.
|
I guess I'm just confused Weitz. You:
- You don't know how much it should cost, despite first saying it was too much.
- Imply that the "wrong auditors" were chosen (overkill).
- Given the point above, imply that the investigation is overkill.
- Also you note "...for what they are trying to investigate here", which implies you think it may not be as serious as pretty much everyone else seems to think it is (it was referred to the RCMP)
But "you're not sure" and get defensive when people challenge your thoughts (e.g. "no one said that").
It just comes across...not in the way I think you think it does. I didn't mean any offense to you, but that was my partisan comment - it seems like a lot of protesting about this issue, just....because?