Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
In May he broke into his ex's house and raped her. He proceeded to take her debit cards, keys and fled in her vehicle.
In July he was charged with a felony for 3rd degree sexual assault stemming from that incident. Because of this the woman had a restraining order on him.
In August the incident took place where he broke the restraining order and apparently tried to steal her car again or whatever other reason he grabbed her keys. Obviously she felt threatened enough to call 911 on this man breaking his restraining order.
Her having three kids with him and him being shot in front of his three kids was connecting dots that may not have been there. But like I said, who cares they all deserved to be protected.
I think most of this comes down to how I feel about knives. They are far deadly than some people give them credit. In that vicinity, he might as well had a loaded gun (which I never once claimed...).
|
You really need to read the articles you link. Try reading the complaint.
https://archive.is/YcYRU
Things that really stand out in this report that make me believe this is a power play:
LNB rented a vehicle for the weekend because she didn’t think her vehicle would make it because of mechanical issues.
The same vehicle that the complainant says was stolen. More on this issue later.
LNB asked her sister Tamara to stay the night and watch her three children while she was gone. LNB returned home at about 4:11AM, her sister was sleeping in the living room on the couch with numerous children so LNB brought her son with her into the first bedroom down the hallway on the east wall, they then lay down to go to sleep.
A witness was in the house but could not provide a corroborating statement to support the claims of the complainant.
LNB stated she was upset but collected herself and ran after the defendant out the front door and then realized her vehicle was missing. LNB ran back inside to her purse, which was on the kitchen counter and checked it, quickly realizing her key to her truck (Ford Explorer 2002), a black individual key and the only key for the vehicle and her Great Lakes Debit Card were missing. LNB immediately called 911 and while waiting for Officers, checked her Great Lakes Account and saw two fraudulent ATM withdrawals on May 3, 2020 that she did not make, both at PNC Bank, 3920 Washington Road, both for $500, at an unknown time,
Again, a possible witness was in the house and such a commotion did not alert the possible witness of these events. The details the witness did provide contradicted the story of the complainant.
Officer Matz spoke to LNB’s sister Tamara, and she advised after LNB had left, the defendant came to the residence for around ten minutes and interacted with the children.
LNB stated whenthe defendant comes over he usually yells through a window for someone to let him in and most likely when he showed up he possibly had one of the children remove the chain latch so he could enter.
So based on the witness testimony and the complainant's own admission it is more probable that the children let the accused into the house. Especially since the witness stated he interacted with the children.
LNB stated she has let the defendant use her vehicle in the past, but that he always asks first,stating it was inappropriate for him to go into her purse.
So the accused had used the vehicle many times in the past, and the complainant had taken out a rental because she believed the vehicle unreliable.
LNB declined to be seen by an FNE, sheepishly saying she’d been through enough and was still very humiliated and upset by the sexual assault. Officer Raiche reports LNB was only wearing a nightgown with no undergarments, so there was nothing to collect for evidentiary purposes.
So she was claiming sexual assault but she refused to she an examiner who could collect evidence to support such a claim? Doesn't smell right.
On May 4, 2020 Officer Courtier met with LNB who stated her Ford Explorer was returned. The defendant had told LNB’s sister, Tamara, he had parked the vehicle outside of her (Tamara’s) residence with the keys. LNB stated she went to Illinois and picked up her vehicle, which was not damaged.
The witness corroborated the accused had returned the vehicle, with the keys and no damage. This appears to be consistent with the comments of the complainant of past instances where the boy friend used the vehicle.
Detective Kunz reports he followed up with PNC Bank ATM and Kwik Trip and searched footage atthe store between the hours of 0500-0615 on the morning of the incident and at this time, is wasbelieved there was no video evidence based on the information obtained so far.
No evidence of any activity from the very locations the complainant told officers the money had been withdrawals. The story continues to unravel.
On May 5, 2020 Detective Kunz spoke with LNB who advised she had located her debit card in her rental after she had cancelled the card and she did not know who made the transactions.
The complainant "found her stolen card" in her rental vehicle, meaning the accused did not take the debt card nor steal any money. The complainant lied to officers about the actions of the accused.
Even though there was a witness in the house at the time of the incidents leading up to the complaint, there investigation could produce no evidence of such claims leveled at the accused. In fact, the investigation discovered several inconsistencies in the complainant's story that would lead one to believe she had lied and many of the details. If she lied about so many details (breaking in, stealing her debit card, stealing money from the account, and the confusion on the vehicle), and refused to work with an examiner to collect evidence of the assault, what is there left here? It basically boils down a she-said-he-said situation, and the number of lies she spun to officers does not provide much credibility to her claims.
#meetoo