Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
It's not confirmed that the flames have been terrible?
They won a playoff round I'm not aware of?
Lazar is a 20 goal scorer and no one told me?
Is the last 10 years of franchise history and results in dispute now?
Is this the Calgarypuck Qanon?
|
So all your opinions come back to this.
Neat. But not really anywhere to go with it.
Here's how I evaluate things to some degree.
First you evaluate if the team has the right strategy. Then you evaluate the moves they are making within that strategy.
Meaning I can still disagree with their high level strategies (examples being making moves to open up the contention window early, and trying to continue to re-tool to win now) but still examine how effective they are in executing that strategy.
You seem to be in a never-ending trap where you think people are disagreeing with you that the Flames have moved too many picks, tried to compete too early, mis-managed assets, etc.
Few are disagreeing with you on those items. The debate over the Lazar deal is long over for everyone but you. I think almost everyone would take a do-over on the Hamonic deal. So again I ask - who are you arguing with?
It comes down to the fact that perhaps you simply want BT fired and Murray Edwards to sell the team (if I'm wrong on either point correct me). And you want Edwards to spend more money to buy Neal out and acquire over paid players. But if those things don't happen, where does that leave you?