Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Surely there's room for both, especially considering the point has long been made, established and confirmed.
Hamonic being injured was a forecastable conclusion and when he let it be publicly known that he wasn't going to sign an extension through the year he should have been moved within a matter of weeks.
While I agree that both the trade for him was bad and that the picks turned into nothing, it's a heck of a lot different than moving out a first and having a player walk away than gaining a 1st after trading a player away.
One asset petered out, the hamonic assets vanished.
Even if it's the same thing are you sure you want to be comparing Treliving and Feaster so directy?
Because if you are, I've got some pretty good one liners about how the regime has changed and things are different now.
|
There's your problem right there.
Strategies about how to run a team cannot be 'confirmed', they are, by nature, opinions. However, you are so certain about your opinion that you have confirmation bias on all events, and are incapable of considering other opinions on this topic.