Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
There’s an interesting conversation going on here that you can choose to participate in or choose to make snarky one liners about
|
Surely there's room for both, especially considering the point has long been made, established and confirmed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
With Hamonic injured nothing
|
Hamonic being injured was a forecastable conclusion and when he let it be publicly known that he wasn't going to sign an extension through the year he should have been moved within a matter of weeks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Bouwmeester was a great opportunity to acquire a valuable asset but they mismanaged his trade and got nothing out of it. The first was late and was used on a player that did nothing. So at the end of the day that asset also evaporated
|
While I agree that both the trade for him was bad and that the picks turned into nothing, it's a heck of a lot different than moving out a first and having a player walk away than gaining a 1st after trading a player away.
One asset petered out, the hamonic assets vanished.
Even if it's the same thing are you sure you want to be comparing Treliving and Feaster so directy?
Because if you are, I've got some pretty good one liners about how the regime has changed and things are different now.