[Makarov]

There isn't really any meaningful distinction between any of these OPCA scams (whether they call themselves "detaxers", FMOTL, lawful rebellion, etc.). They all recycle the same nonsensical arguments and use the same archaic legalistic terms to (try to) mask their unfamiliarity with the law or court processes.

Early in my career, I worked in the litigation department of a provincial government and was tasked with responding to the various OPCA letters or pleadings that would trickle in. I also used to actively post on several FMOTL forums (in the hopes that lurkers wouldn't be lead down the path to ruin by the advice being given). I used to be quite proud of the patient and diligent consideration that some Canadian courts gave to OPCA litigants (as it evidenced the fairness of our judicial system). However, now that the justice system has Meads v. Meads, I don't think any further consideration is necessary. That decision should provide ample grounds for summary dismissal of OPCA nonsense (and I always understood that was the purpose of that decision).