Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I struggle to understand where the line is between a re-build and re-tool. But in my mind it is clear that you have to conclude that this re-build failed. And it largely failed because it's success hinged on progression of the core. And too many players failed to take another step and even regressed: Johnny, Monahan, Sam, Rittich, Jankowski, etc. You needed some of that group to find another level, and they didn't.
As others have stated, the series win over Vancouver, probably ended up being more of a curse as it motivated the franchise to try and open their contention window too early.
I would approach the off-season by trading Johnny and Monahan and seeing what type of returns you get. If it's picks then you are in a re-build. If there are roster players involved maybe it's a re-tool.
|
This is the way I see it as well.
The rebuild has failed and significant change needs to happen. There are some nice emerging pieces on the roster, but the biggest issue is the team's top talent failing to become true difference makers.
Monahan and/or Gaudreau could be moved in "hockey trades" (e.g Johansen for Jones, Hall for Larsson). If so, I imagine that the "retooled" flames will expect to compete for the playoffs next year.
Alternatively, they could ship one or both players for prospects and picks, which means we are likely in a full-blown rebuild and the team will be weaker on paper next year, and future success may be more distant.
The merits of either approach really depend on the return imo. Either way, it would be amazing if we could come out on top on a one-sided trade. Like a reverse gilmour trade (a guy can dream... right??). After another tortuous end to a season, I feel that I'm left grasping at straws here.
The coach issue also needs to be addressed. Ward may not be the biggest problem with the team, but I can't see him as Head Coach being part of the solution.