Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
No, it's not, as you've just demonstrated. "Every family situation is different." Yes, everyone has their own issues at home that they have to deal with, and Rask is just like everyone else. But he's the only one who's quitting on his teammates. Again, it's a different story if there is some other information we're not privy to - perhaps his newborn is sick, or his wife needs special support because of some issue she's having - but not only do we not know that, we're explicitly being told that's not the case. He just decided it wasn't what he felt like doing right now. I cannot imagine being part of a hockey team in a playoff situation where teammates are relying on you to give your all, and coming to that conclusion. Hell, I can't imagine it in my own job - I wouldn't hang my co-workers out to dry like that..
|
Of course there's information we are not privy to. We have no idea what his family dynamics are as a husband as a father. We have no idea what the impacts of this situation have been on the people he cares about. Just because we don't believe his newborn is sick, doesn't mean there aren't things going on that motivate him to go home. To take the information we have (which is little) and go to "He just decided i wasn't what he felt like doing right now" is a huge leap. And I'll tell you right now if my family needed me I would work with my employer to make sure I could be there for them. The world needs to prioritize mental health and family well being more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
No, we don't have to just shrug our shoulders every decision that everyone else makes. It's perfectly legitimate for people to make judgments about the decisions made by others in the public sphere, which Rask is. There are absolutely things hockey players can choose to do that are open to reproach from fans, and in my opinion, leaving your teammates because you just don't feel like continuing to compete alongside them is one of those things. I didn't say he was an awful person, nor did I wish ill on him or his family. I said he quit on the team, because based on what his GM has said, that's precisely what he did. It's completely fair to look at that decision and say, "that's poor form by Rask".
You and your moralizing "that's an ugly take" self-righteous holier-than-thou schtick any time anyone has a negative view of something an NHL player has done is utterly tiresome.
.
|
When people start judging hockey players as people instead of their performance then yes I object. They are still humans. With human relationships.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
I'm talking about Rask's decision. You've decided to change the whole tone of this discussion just to take a personal shot at me. But that's not surprising given your posting history - you really like making things personal whenever you can, don't you? Well, I happen to think that tendency reflects poorly on you, every single time you demonstrate it.
|
Neat.