[MissTeeks]

That’s a good chunk of change:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1293671426092929033

His comments:

“This is why the league’s a joke, in my opinion, on these things,” Brind’Amour told Luke DeCock of The News & Observer. “That one is a crime scene.”

There also seemed to be some confusion over what Brind'Amour was challenging, and he wasn't happy with the communication from the officials.

“They came to me, and I said, ‘If he has possession of it then it’s goalie interference. If he doesn’t have possession then it’s a hand pass. It’s one of the two. I don’t know what you’re calling on the ice,’” Brind’Amour said, per DeCock. “All he has to do is tell me. ‘We’re calling it nonpossession (by Mrazek),’ then we’re challenging a glove-hand pass. If it’s possession, then goaltender interference. I said, ‘Tell me the call on the ice.’ They wouldn’t do it when I say, ‘What is the call?’ So I had to flip a coin. ...

“I said, ‘What was the call on the ice?’ and he said, ‘You’ve got to call one or the other.’ It should be so easy. If they said the goalie had it, then it’s an easy call. They wouldn’t tell you. It makes no sense. I know we weren’t the better team, but if that goal doesn’t go in, do we win that game? I don’t know.”